data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54c50/54c502ab420e419fa4b38b07ecc2773c280d1740" alt=""
Mind you that all this is tracked via IP address so is kinda affected the whole office -- if they went to Wikipedia for some reason, they would see they had messages. Luckily, I can't imagine anyone using it. So, Matt filled me in on what was going down so I went and read the comments left on our user page and promptly removed them. Within minutes, they were back with a warning not to change the page (even though it was our user page?). I removed the warning and it was back with another warning...stating: Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to User talk:12.46.232.89, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. PCEevee talk 20:43, 9 June 2006 (UTC).
So, I added to OUR user page that the people of Wikipedia were insane (which they obviously are). Which, well, within seconds was removed and the following now was there: This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User talk:12.46.232.89, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. John254 20:49, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
And the PCEevee person left another message too saying they weren't insane. But, they clearly are. For one, who has time to monitor beef stroganoff and detect changes that quickly? Two, who has time to monitor a user page? Three, why can't the user edit their user page? Four, why are the people so militant about the changes?
I know they have to keep certain things from happening but they don't have to Nazis about it. A simple entry about the Blue Bird serving beef stroganoff isn't something that is that bad. It's true. I can prove it. Anyway, I think the people who edit Wikipedia are in a cult (maybe Scientology). They have their own language on there and they don't like outsiders. It's a nice resource but don't make a change whatever you do. Or else you could be BLOCKED or BANNED completely.
No comments:
Post a Comment